<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/</link>
	<description>Faith, Father, Family Man, Frequent Failure of Frivolous Functions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:48:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soft Chewable Lovegra</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Soft Chewable Lovegra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>The repeal bill would need 60 votes in the 100-member Senate, and sponsors acknowledged the votes aren&#039;t there. The measure would have no chance in the ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The repeal bill would need 60 votes in the 100-member Senate, and sponsors acknowledged the votes aren&#8217;t there. The measure would have no chance in the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dating</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Dating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Buffalo held its fourth gun buyback Saturday, and police collected more than 600 firearms at sevenchurches throughout the city. The no-questions-asked program yielded more than 200 nonworkingguns, 170 rifles,  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffalo held its fourth gun buyback Saturday, and police collected more than 600 firearms at sevenchurches throughout the city. The no-questions-asked program yielded more than 200 nonworkingguns, 170 rifles, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: søgemaskineoptimering</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>søgemaskineoptimering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>D&#039;Amato took over as chairman of a special Whitewater committee in the Senate. He may have genuinely expected to uncover a smoking gun that would bring the president down, but his crusading succeeded only in lowering his poll numbers back in New York. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;Amato took over as chairman of a special Whitewater committee in the Senate. He may have genuinely expected to uncover a smoking gun that would bring the president down, but his crusading succeeded only in lowering his poll numbers back in New York. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valley</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Valley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Nice points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akvalley</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>akvalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I was talking to one of my former college roommates about this whole thing and he mentioned something out that we tend to forget about although it&#039;s a logical concept.  Most of the time when we are in church, our backs are facing the doors.  How would you stop an armed person when you didn&#039;t have the split-second time to react? Especially if your first clue that there is an incident is the gunfire from the incident? The person with the carry permit trying to return fire to the shooter would have to correctly identify said shoot in the midst of pandemonium and In the close quarters of the building.  And that&#039;s just part of the practical/logistical reason for not getting into this -- leave the protection services to the trained professionals.   Shooting wildlife and protecting innocent lives in distress are completely different disciplines.  A carry permit does not prepare you for these circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking to one of my former college roommates about this whole thing and he mentioned something out that we tend to forget about although it&#39;s a logical concept.  Most of the time when we are in church, our backs are facing the doors.  How would you stop an armed person when you didn&#39;t have the split-second time to react? Especially if your first clue that there is an incident is the gunfire from the incident? The person with the carry permit trying to return fire to the shooter would have to correctly identify said shoot in the midst of pandemonium and In the close quarters of the building.  And that&#39;s just part of the practical/logistical reason for not getting into this &#8212; leave the protection services to the trained professionals.   Shooting wildlife and protecting innocent lives in distress are completely different disciplines.  A carry permit does not prepare you for these circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nlvalleysr</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>nlvalleysr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. With the number of church shootings, which is amazing, trained professionals should be near the house of worship if it&#039;s considered unsafe. Small congregations, who may not be able to afford security, may already know of some pending threat to a congregation. Larger congregation, in my opinion, should have security by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. With the number of church shootings, which is amazing, trained professionals should be near the house of worship if it&#39;s considered unsafe. Small congregations, who may not be able to afford security, may already know of some pending threat to a congregation. Larger congregation, in my opinion, should have security by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

